By Randy Olson
That’s a big mistake, says Randy Olson: Hollywood has much to educate scientists approximately the way to inform a story—and, finally, the right way to do technology greater. With Houston, we now have a Narrative, he lays out a stunningly basic approach for turning the boring into the dramatic. Drawing on his designated historical past, which observed him go away his activity as a operating scientist to release a occupation as a filmmaker, Olson first diagnoses the matter: while scientists let us know approximately their paintings, they pile one second and one element atop one other second and one other detail—a stultifying procession of “and, and, and.” What we'd like as a substitute is an realizing of the fundamental components of tale, the narrative constructions that our brains are all yet hardwired to appear for—which Olson boils down, brilliantly, to “And, yet, Therefore,” or ABT. At a stroke, the ABT method introduces momentum (“And”), clash (“But”), and backbone (“Therefore”)—the primary development blocks of tale. As Olson has proven through major numerous workshops around the world, while scientists’ eyes are opened to ABT, the influence is brilliant: all of sudden, they’re not only speaking approximately their work—they’re telling stories approximately it. And audiences are captivated.
Written with an unusual verve and exuberance, and equipped on rules which are appropriate to fields some distance past technological know-how, Houston, we've got a Narrative has the facility to remodel the best way technology is known and preferred, and eventually how it’s done.